data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f743/6f743e535fc274e2a1c9f7dfc201d825842e9268" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/797a2/797a2e24ed1787bc228e94ed3f4540deab0fd995" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e32c5/e32c5eb43ae4daf1864e3db69bb31fc4cf311d15" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2a10/d2a108e47be6c69efcdf26990fe47d547cf7bad7" alt=""
I have no problem with my listening mark, I lost focus early on when I didn't realise that the speaker had moved onto the next page. Then I fumbled up later on as well.
Reading, I've out done myself, (whoo hoo! chocolate covered double chocolate donut without the hole in the middle!) going at it like a relentless pack of wild dogs and earned the mark I rightfully deserved.
Writing marks resulted from me not getting as much practice as I had planned plus having an off day at the test. It just didn't flow as when I usually write and the stars weren't in alignment as well.
Speaking was an 8. Ok another mark i'm not happy with, even though it's better than a 7 *shudders at the thought*. Thought patterns and speaking rhythm do not have to be one continuous stream to be acceptable as highly skillful. Pauses dramatic or otherwise, gesturing, ho-humming are all part of modern speech. Oh and i'm sorry if the invigilator cannot keep up with me nor understand what I said at one point. I made perfect sense, proper vernacular AND grammatically correct. But I didn't feel I should've pointed out that what I had replied was precisely framed based on her question. My mistake, next time *i hope i won't have to again* I will point it out. Plus I do not feel all that comfortable talking to non-native english speakers as freely and lucidly as i would with native speakers. Even with native speakers, I gauge them and only talk to them within their realm of knowledge and culture. So gimme my damn 9 and we'll call it square fibonacci.
No comments:
Post a Comment